So Why Are You Here? Assessing Risk in HIV Prevention and Test Decision Counselling
Sociology of Health and Illness, Vol: 23, Issue: 4, Page: 447-477
2001
- 9Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage9
- Abstract Views9
Article Description
This paper examines how counsellors attempt to assess clients' risks for contracting HIV when they come in for HIV testing. Starting with Maynard's (1989) proposal that an analysis of social problems should begin with an analysis of talk-in-interaction, I examine how a client's 'problem' of being at-risk for HIV is made visible or not in HIV prevention and test decision counselling sessions. First, I analyse counsellors' use of open-ended questions as a method for making the problem of at-risk for HIV visible within the interaction and how clients respond to those questions. Second, I analyse how the meaning of the clients' risks is negotiated in the interaction as counsellors support or contest clients' accounts for getting an HIV test.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know