Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in High Intensity Minimal Exchange Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Raceways
2012
- 40Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage40
- Downloads28
- Abstract Views12
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Three separate shrimp (litopenaeus vannamei) growouts were examined at The University of Southern Mississippi's Thad Cochran Marine Aquaculture Center. The objectives of this project were to (1) determine if there was a significant difference in any water quality parameters between the 2 density treatments, (2) construct carbon and nitrogen budgets to see where the carbon and nitrogen went in the system for all growouts, (3) determine if plastic media had any effects on water quality parameters and shrimp production, (4) determine if plastic media allowed for a nitrifying bacteria population to establish more rapidly, (5) determine if the two solids treatments had any effects on water quality parameters and shrimp production, and (6) run a stable isotope mixing model. Once a week, one liter of water was collected from each tank of each growout. From this liter the following analysis were performed, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), ammonium (NH4) , nitrite (NO2) , nitrate (NO3) , soluble reactive phosphorous (SRP), particulate organic carbon (POC), particulate organic nitrogen (PON) and bacterial abundance (BA). The first growout had a complete die-off. The carbon and nitrogen budgets for the second and third growouts showed overall that the major input was feed and the major output was shrimp at harvest. The plastic media did not show any statistically significant effect on water quality or shrimp production; it also did not allow for a nitrifying bacteria population to establish more rapidly. The two solids treatments did not have any statistically significant effect on overall water quality or shrimp production. The shrimp isotopic signatures were constant, but the biofloc isotopic signatures varied.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know