Identifying Common Code Reading Patterns using Scanpath Trend Analysis with a Tolerance
2018
- 73Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage73
- Abstract Views73
Conference Paper Description
Eye tracking data, particularly scanpath, provides valuable insights about code reading patterns which could describe actual comprehension strategies used. However, aggregating multiple scanpaths into one representative path is challenging since individual scanpaths tend to be different and are highly individualistic. The differences may affect the identification of a representative path which could decrease its similarity to individual scanpaths. Thus, we aim to identify a trending scanpath using Scanpath Trend Analysis (STA) with a tolerance to reveal common code reading patterns of high and low performing students while finding bugs in a static source code. Results show that variance exists in the scanpaths of high performing students which suggests that they follow varied code reading patterns while low performing students follow similar code reading patterns. Further, high performing students read code in a logical manner and a somewhat linear code reading pattern along with chunking of program code was employed which makes it possible to perceive the program better and hence, error regions are fixated. In contrast, low performing students jump directly to certain statements without following program's logic. This study addresses the challenge of identifying common code reading patterns that could help us determine effective strategies to be explicitly taught to students and develop learning materials to help improve their code reading and code comprehension skills.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know