Childhood adversity and deviant peers: Considering behavioral selection and cultural socialization pathways
2020
- 71Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage71
- Abstract Views71
Article Description
Can childhood adversity affect who your peers are? Studies on deviant peers explain their formation due to school and neighborhood factors, often ignoring the socialization at home. Similarly, studies on childhood ad- versities focus on educational and health outcomes, often ignoring its potential impact on one’s social re- lationships. In an attempt to make these two distinct literatures converse with each other, this research suggests the influence of childhood adversity on associating with deviant peers through behavioral selection and cultural socialization—i.e., how adversity affects anti-social behaviors that impact selecting into deviant peers, and how adversity affects one’s norms that impact being socialized by deviant peers. Performing mediation analysis with the US Panel Study of Income Dynamics (n = 1018), I find that childhood adversity influences deviant peer association, mediated by anti-social behavior and adolescent peer pressure. This suggests that associating with deviant peers can arise from the normalization of nonconformity, behavioral response to toxic stress, and reinforcement from peer socializers.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know