Developmental spelling stages of Grade 4 pupils
2017
- 37Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage37
- Abstract Views37
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This study used and followed the 20-point Screening Test made by Ganske in order to determine the developmental stages of spelling the Grade 4 students are currently at. Selected students were then given the Feature Analysis test in order to confirm the Screening Test and find out the features the students are currently struggling with. These helped determine the common errors, consistencies and inconsistencies the students have with the stage development of spelling as proposed by Henderson. In doing so, the study was able to determine if the students follow the developmental stage theory of spelling. The tests were graded and compiled in accordance with how Ganske outlined the method in her book, Word Journeys (2000). The errors were then compiled and analyzed according to their stage of development and were compared to how Henderson predicted their errors ought to be at certain stages. The study found out that the students follow the developmental stage theory of spelling that they fall under Stages 3 - 5, the stages that Henderson stated they would be. The errors the students committed were consistent with what the developmental stages proposed by Henderson described. There were a few inconsistencies seen in some stages that may be attributed to the curriculum the students underwent in the school system. It was also noted that many of the students fall under the transition stages as suggested by Ganske. It was then concluded that even though the students follow the developmental stages of spelling proposed by Henderson, there are some gaps were seen that fail to account for the students that are in the transition stages. Most of the errors that the students made follow the developmental stages that Henderson described but there were also some inconsistent errors that may be explained by the curriculum.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know