A LAK of Direction: Misalignment Between the Goals of Learning Analytics and its Research Scholarship
Journal of Learning Analytics, ISSN: 1929-7750, Vol: 10, Issue: 2, Page: 1-13
2023
- 22Citations
- 193Usage
- 34Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- Usage193
- Downloads115
- Abstract Views78
- Captures34
- Readers34
- 32
Article Description
Learning analytics (LA) defines itself with a focus on data from learners and learning environments, with corresponding goals of understanding and optimizing student learning. LA research, ideally, should make use of data from learners engaged in education systems, should measure student learning, and should improve these learning environments. However, a common concern among members of the LA research community is that these standards are not being met. In two analyses, we reviewed a large, comprehensive sample of research articles from the proceedings of the three most recent Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) conferences and from articles published in the Journal of Learning Analytics (JLA) in 2020, 2021, and 2022. We found that 37.4% of articles do not analyze data from learners in an education system, 71.1% do not include any measure of learning outcomes, and 89% do not attempt to intervene in the learning environment. We contrast these findings with the stated definition of LA and infer, like others before us, that LA scholarship presently lacks clear direction toward its stated goals. We invite critical discussion of these findings from the LA community, through open peer commentary.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85159920146&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.7913; https://learning-analytics.info/index.php/JLA/article/view/7913; https://arrow.tudublin.ie/bladatascart/6; https://arrow.tudublin.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=bladatascart; https://dx.doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.7913
Society for Learning Analytics Research
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know