PROFESSIONALISING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING TEACHERS IN GUIDING AND ASSESSING REFLECTION
SEFI 2023 - 51st Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering Education: Engineering Education for Sustainability, Proceedings, Page: 415-424
2023
- 2Citations
- 54Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Usage54
- Downloads43
- Abstract Views11
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
The current knowledge society of the 21st century requires students, among other things, to have the ability to think reflectively. Various studies show however that educational programs and teachers, from engineering programs in particular, experience difficulties in integrating the development of students' reflection skills in their curricula. This gave rise to a multi-year project on improving reflection in engineering educational programs. We worked with teacher teams of 6 programs to improve their curricula and teacher practices regarding reflection. Part of the project were training sessions for teachers focused on guiding and assessing reflection activities of their students. This paper presents a study that was conducted in relation to this training to gain insight into: 1) teachers' guidance and assessment skills and 2) the contribution of the training to any changes in these skills. A selection of teachers of the participating teams were interviewed before and after the training (N = 8). To gain insight into teachers' guiding skills, we designed and recorded video's that depict multiple authentic, prototypical situations. Text excerpts of written reflection reports were used to unravel teachers thoughts and approaches regarding assessing students' reflections. The interview protocol aimed to elicit teaching interventions and actions regarding guidance and assessment of students' reflections and teachers rationales and thoughts behind these interventions and actions. Results indicate a shift in teachers' guiding and assessment skills before and after the training; their skill repertoire seems expanded and reflection questions they would ask their students aimed at deeper reflection.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85179852184&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.21427/5ev2-mp91; https://arrow.tudublin.ie/sefi2023_respap/79; https://arrow.tudublin.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1078&context=sefi2023_respap; https://dx.doi.org/10.21427/5ev2-mp91; https://arrow.tudublin.ie/sefi2023_respap/79/
Technological University Dublin
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know