Mapping whale-watching effort using AIS data in the Salish Sea
2022
- 53Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage53
- Downloads34
- Abstract Views19
Artifact Description
Commercial boat-based whale-watching is a very important touristic sector in the Salish Sea, taking thousands of people to view and experience up close the natural beauty and wildlife of the area. This sector provides economic benefits to local communities and opportunities for education and increase awareness for nature protection. The recent growth of whale-watching activities also can bring potential negative effects such as disturbances to wildlife. To achieve a sustainable commercial whale-watching sector, it is important to gain a good understanding of the footprint this activity has on the marine environment. For this, we assessed the spatio-temporal distribution of whale watching activities and their overlap with sensitive ecological areas. First, we developed an algorithm that classifies Automatic Identification System (AIS) vessel data from known commercial whale-watching vessels into wildlife viewing and transiting positions based on vessel speeds. Data analysed included AIS data collected in 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 in the Salish Sea. Wildlife viewing positions were used to estimate whale-watching effort based on the cumulative time whale-watching vessels spend wildlife viewing in a location. We then used marine protected areas and other area-based conservation measures to determine the degree of overlap between whale watching effort and ecologically sensitive areas. Results show areas consistently visited by whale-watching vessels during the study period, while other whale-watching hotspots are more dynamic and vary depending on the time of the year and targeted species. We conclude that the presented methodology applied to AIS data can provide a valuable tool to assess whale-watching activities and their potential effect to coastal environments.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know