U.S. Public Equity ESG Fund Composite and Parnassus Core Equity Fund: Performance and Factor Attribution
Discussions, Vol: 19, Issue: 1
2024
- 170Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage170
- Downloads104
- Abstract Views66
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
This is the first paper to examine all U.S. public equity Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) funds offered by the Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment’s (SIF) institutional member firms from 2005 to 2020. For ease of communication, this will be called the ESG Composite. With a Net Asset Value (NAV) over $150 billion, these funds comprise nearly half of the U.S. public equity ESG investment landscape. The article finds that the ESG Composite maintains performance with the Standard and Poor’s (S&P) 500 total return index on an overall returns basis with lower volatility, indicating greater risk-adjusted returns. Factor analysis reveals that the ESG Composite returns are primarily driven by underleveraged exposure to market returns as well as prevalence of mid-to-large cap and high beta stocks. When isolating the largest fund in the ESG Composite — the Parnassus Core Equity Fund (PRBLX) portfolio — this study finds significant outperformance over the S&P 500 on an overall returns basis. Factor analysis reveals greater emphasis on underleverage to the market and greater preference for large cap, high beta stocks. When compared to the global mutual fund universe, the ESG Composite outperforms in annualized returns and Sharpe ratios, whereas the PRBLX portfolio outperforms in annualized returns, annualized Sharpe ratios, annualized alphas, and annualized information ratios. Conclusions drawn from this study will (1) supplement the discussion on ESG usefulness and (2) present actionable investment insights.
Bibliographic Details
Case Western Reserve University
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know