A Simplified Approach to Quantifying a Child's Bilingual Language Experience
2012
- 17Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage17
- Downloads14
- Abstract Views3
Article Description
There is an increasing need to accurately and efficiently describe a bilingual child's dynamic linguistic experience during audiological evaluations. This report documents an approach at qualitatively capturing linguistic exposure and usage information in a time-efficient manner. A well-known pediatric bilingual survey was administered to 83 parents of bilingual children, obtaining information on the child's exposure (input) to and usage (output) of Spanish and English on an hourly basis (17 time frames) during a typical weekday and weekend. Parents also completed a questionnaire that obtains demographic information of the child and family, parent-rated language proficiency of the child, and a family language history profile. A factor analysis, utilizing three time intervals, indicated that condensing the full-length survey's 17 time frames to three time frames accounts for > 74% of the variation in language exposure and usage information. Data suggest that there is potential to condense the full-day diary approach (17 time frames) to a more time efficient method of collecting data from only three time intervals while capturing similar valuable linguistic information providing information to the audiology clinician about the dynamic pediatric bilingual linguistic experience. Next steps will require data collection for the full-length hour-by-hour survey and for the condensed time intervals within the same cohort of children. These data are necessary to confirm a strong correlation between the language exposure and usage information of the two approaches.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know