BE SERIOUS ABOUT DIVERSITY: EXPLORING WHY INNOVATION COMMUNITIES ARE NOT DIVERSE
2017
- 470Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage470
- Downloads392
- Abstract Views78
Artifact Description
BE SERIOUS ABOUT DIVERSITY:EXPLORING WHY INNOVATION COMMUNITIES ARE NOT DIVERSEJULIA CARRASQUELInnovators and entrepreneurs rely on support, resources and collaboration to succeed, but who can access these resources? Failure is a constant variable in the learning progression of an entrepreneur, but who can afford to fail? There exist inherent biases that prevent women and minority entrepreneurs from entering entrepreneurial pipelines, which has led to a general lack of diversity within innovation communities. This paper, unlike other bodies of research, does not explore why diversity (or the lack thereof) is an important issue to consider in innovation and entrepreneurship. On the contrary, this paper assumes diversity is important and necessary in innovation communities, and instead focuses on exploring why diversity programs are failing and why resources remain largely inaccessible. Exploring issues of diversity in innovation communities, unavoidably makes us question the very foundation of what entrepreneurship and innovation are. With qualitative data gathered from interviews with leaders of some of the organizations in the Boston area pioneering diversity efforts, this paper finds that diversity is ultimately not for everyone; diversity is considered risky; innovation communities are exclusionary in their nature, and accelerators and incubator programs mostly consider high-growth ventures as the only ventures worthy of entrepreneurialism - and of their support. For those committed to diversity, we understand diversity as structural change, power decentralization and long-term commitments.Kathryn Madden, M.C.P, S.M.Arch. S. Chief InstructorJohn Dobson, Assistant Professor
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know