Creating a Positive Classroom Environment
2016
- 1,484Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,484
- Downloads1,121
- 1,121
- Abstract Views363
Artifact Description
Creating a positive classroom environment has long been a topic of research at the kindergarten through high school levels. However, less research is available at college/university level despite evidence that suggests its importance to the successful delivery of course content. Relevant information from the Faculty Academic Orientation Manual has been summarized to provide the backdrop for two paradigms. The journalistic paradigm Who, What, When, Where, How and Why is useful for assessing the characteristics of students and the challenges they face. A more recent paradigm Situation, Purpose, Audience, and Method (SPAM) presented by Dr. Laurie Rozakis has been adapted to facilitate utilization of data from the first paradigm. The use of such background data enhances the development of a positive classroom environment. Furthermore, the flexibility inherent in both paradigms permits the instructor to extrapolate additional information on an as needed basis. The expeditious delivery of course content to a focused, goal-oriented population in a positive classroom environment is deemed desirable. The paradigms expand available choices to faculty striving to achieve that goal.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know