Modelling and Experimentally Verifying Laser Contact Printing Optical System Using Code V
2020
- 139Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage139
- Abstract Views91
- Downloads48
Artifact Description
One of the most upcoming advances in modern technology is the development and fabrication of flexible microelectronics, however, it can be difficult to make use of semiconductor and metal nanoparticle properties due to the limitations of many current methods used to deposit such materials onto three-dimensional substrates. Conventional methods of depositing nanoparticles require extremely high heat in order to vaporize ink carrying particles, resulting in higher cost and slower production. By using a laser to organize nano-dot arrays, one can comprise a thin, flexible semiconductor film. This process uses a liquid suspension, carrying metal nanoparticles, in the form of microdroplets.Throughout this research, there was a heavy focus on the construction of a functional model of the optical system used for laser nanoparticle contact printing. This model was built using CODE-V Optical design software. It features a 1064 nm Gaussian beam propagating through an axicon lens, followed by a collimating biconvex lens, and then reflecting off of a parabolic mirror at a 90-degree angle. The beam is then focused using a simulated microdroplet as a super-lens. The purpose of this research is to verify the simulation experimentally. In the laboratory setting, variant weight percentages of sonicated Zinc Sulfide were sintered onto glass substrates. The heat from the laser evaporated the liquid suspension surrounding the nanoparticles, resulting in a refined conductive line of metal that can be observed through a microscope. This research is still ongoing, as parameters for the liquid suspension as well as the system are still being optimized.A huge thank you to Dr.Vikas Sudesh, Dr.Aravinda Kar, Tianyi Li, Christopher Kosan, Gunjan Kulkarni, University of Central Florida, and The Office of Undergraduate Research.Key Words: Film Deposition, Laser Printing, Guassian Beam, Nanoparticles, Microdroplet, Laser Deposition, CODE-V, Axicon, Biconvex, Parabolic Mirror
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know