Space Debris Mitigation: Understanding the Business Case and Proposing Solutions
2022
- 100Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage100
- Downloads85
- Abstract Views15
Artifact Description
The U.S. Department of Defense is tracking over 20,000 artificial satellites — payloads, rocket bodies, and other non-functioning articles, of which approximately 90% of these objects are categorized as debris. With no government mandates to remove or limit debris of the commercial sector’s own making in lower Earth orbit (LEO), the amount of space debris is rising at an alarming rate, as evidenced by the 50% increase over two years of defunct, yet orbiting, satellites. The implications for the space economy can be severe, ranging from higher operational costs to increased risk for humans and spacecraft safety. Further, while technological solutions exist, business case solutions are yet to emerge and indeed may be more challenging to attain.The main objective of this research is to investigate the pressing issue of space debris mitigation from a business perspective and find solutions for the commercial players. More specifically, through literature reviews, subject matter expert interviews, and survey data analytics, we investigate both the positive and negative incentives that can influence or create the business case. These range from reduction of insurance premiums to implementation of tax strategies; each incentive has its own direct or indirect impacts on space debris limitation. Lessons learned from other sectors and other countries are reviewed and evaluated. Critical to our research is finding business solutions that create a safer space environment in LEO without simultaneously creating a disadvantage to U.S. companies competing in the business of space on a global scale. Through our research investigation, our data statistics from industry experts believe that space debris is a serious issue and there is a need to resolve the growth of space debris in LEO orbit. However, the results are split as far as what incentives would be best to facilitate the removal of space debris.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know