XR in Aviation Training: Insight from Academia, Industry, and Non-Profit Institutions
2022
- 272Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage272
- Downloads211
- Abstract Views61
Abstract Description
The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on education and training. Institutions that relied heavily on face-to-face instruction suddenly needed alternative modalities to keep students on course, forcing educators and trainers to employ a variety of educational techniques via technologies that they may not have had experience with. This shift has brought the advantages – and disadvantages – of augmented, mixed, and virtual reality technologies (collectively, extended reality or XR) for education and training into sharp focus. Programs were quickly assembled, and not always with consideration of learning theories. As learning and training were resumed in in-person settings, academics and industry alike were faced with a new challenge: How do we continue to develop XR technologies to leverage efficiencies and expand opportunities without sacrificing learning and training outcomes?This question has brought researchers, practitioners, developers, and innovators together into an XR Research Consortium to advocate for the design, evaluation, implementation, and sharing of findings of XR technology in a variety of learning and training environments. Although many of the members have a background in aviation and aerospace, a goal of the Consortium is to expand into other industries and promote XR technologies as educational tools.Members of the Consortium will discuss: Current research, gaps in the research, potential for XR Using XR to make learning/training more accessible Choosing an XR technology that aligns with learning/training outcomes Cybersecurity considerations of XR in a learning/training environment Demonstrations of XR applications for training will be included. The session will include time for an open discussion.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know