Validation of Training Satisfaction Survey
2023
- 205Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage205
- Downloads138
- Abstract Views67
Abstract Description
The Training Satisfaction Survey (TSS) was developed as part of a larger project to examine the features of Virtual Reality software and supporting devices as a training program on visual illusions and spatial disorientation. The TSS is a 13-item, self-report scale which gauges participants’ level of training satisfaction. Participants responded regarding their most recent experience with a Frasca C172 Level 6 Flight Training Device. The TSS was designed to measure overall satisfaction using three subfactors: relevance, enjoyment, and technology satisfaction. These factors can be used to identify impediments to learning (e.g., training was not easy to follow) to create more effective training programs. A reliability analysis was conducted (N=159) resulting in good inter-item correlations (the lowest being .43). A factor analysis showed this scale passed Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity (.00) and the KMO Measure of Sampling Adequacy (.93). Factor extraction was determined using Kaiser’s criterion wherein only factors with an eigenvalue of 1.0 or more are retained. Together these items explain 65.25% of the variance in the data. The resultant scree plot and pattern matrix indicates a two-factor solution: enjoyment and technology satisfaction. It may be that the scale has too few items or the sample size is too small to show a distinction between the three theoretical subfactors. Still training officials can implement this scale to measure their trainee’s enjoyment and their satisfaction with the training technology. This presentation will also discuss and provide guidance on the processes required to develop and validate device-specific scales.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know