Trustworthiness Requirements for Manufacturing Cyber-physical Systems
Procedia Manufacturing, ISSN: 2351-9789, Vol: 11, Page: 973-981
2017
- 22Citations
- 182Usage
- 66Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef1
- Usage182
- Downloads164
- Abstract Views18
- Captures66
- Readers66
- 66
Article Description
Distributed manufacturing operations include cyber-physical systems vulnerable to cyber-attacks. Long time not considered a priority, cybersecurity jumped to the forefront of manufacturing concerns due to the need to network together legacy, newer equipment, and entire operation centers. This paper proposes trustworthiness solutions for integrated manufacturing physical-cyber worlds, where trustworthiness is defined to complement system dependability requirements with cybersecurity requirements, such that the resulting manufacturing cyber-physical system delivers services that can justifiably be trusted. Acknowledging the inevitability of cyber-attacks, the paper models the cybersecurity component using the resilient systems framework, where system resilience is viewed as preservation of a required state of cybersecurity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978917304109; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.202; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85029833303&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2351978917304109; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2351978917304109?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2351978917304109?httpAccept=text/plain; https://commons.erau.edu/publication/1255; https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2354&context=publication; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.202
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know