Military Space Doctrine
1979
- 492Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage492
- Downloads472
- Abstract Views20
Artifact Description
General Thomas D. White, Chief of Staff of the Air Force, introduced the term, "aerospace," during Congressional testimony in the late 1950s. He did this to anchor future Air Force functions, roles, missions, and tasks in this operational medium. We must continue this thrust—an Air Force dedicated to a future in space.Our scientific, technological, and economic communities have established the industrial base for this Nation to proceed with the conduct of space operations. Now our basic doctrine and strategy and our operational concepts, doctrine, and strategy must advance to provide the direction, scope, and vision necessary for future space programs and operations.Purposeful action must be taken to build a spaceoperations capability. We must build the conceptual foundation for space missions by understanding the opportunity for military space operations. We must develop an extended plan and strategy—with the priorities— to establish our space functions and responsibilities. We must establish the institution to organize, develop, train, equip, and sustain our space forces. And we must set up a unified organization for deployment and employment of space resources.Then we must act to bring our concepts to reality. All these efforts are required to preserve the security, freedom, and welfare of the United States.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know