The Effects of Age on the Perception of Frequency in Noise
2016
- 33Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage33
- Abstract Views20
- Downloads13
Artifact Description
Difficulty understanding speech in the presence of background noise is one of the most common complaints of older adults, both with and without hearing loss. One possible contributing factor is an age-related decline in neural synchrony (e.g., phase locking). Tones-in-noise were used to disrupt rate-place coding of frequency and to encourage participants to use phase-locked representations of frequency during a behavioral frequency discrimination task. Thirteen Fourteen adults participated (five younger, aged 21-29; three four middle aged, 41-50; and five older, aged 61-80). Participants had clinically normal hearing sensitivity (≤ 25 dB HL at octave frequencies 250 – 4000 Hz). Tone-in-noise detection thresholds and frequency discrimination limens (FDLs) were obtained at 500 and 1000 Hz, separately. Tone level was 60 dB SPL; octave-wide noise was centered at the test frequency. FDLs were tested in three conditions: quiet, +5, and +10 dB. Conditions at +5 and +10 dB used SNRs relative to each participant’s tone-in-noise detection thresholds. The Words-in-Noise test was used to assess speech-in-noise understanding. Preliminary findings indicate that tone-in-noise detection thresholds were not significantly different across age groups; however, detection thresholds for 1000 Hz were significantly higher (poorer) than for 500 Hz. Frequency discrimination limens were significantly poorer (larger) in the presence of noise; however, no significant age effects were found. Speech-in-noise understanding was not significantly different across age groups. Frequency discrimination results indicate that the presence of noise worsened FDLs, as expected. The presence of noise may reduce the effectiveness of some neural coding strategies available to listeners.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know