Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy value theory
2012
- 6,166Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage6,166
- Downloads5,913
- 5,913
- Abstract Views253
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Abstract Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT) (Eccles et al., 1983) offers one of the most influential models for understanding motivation. One component of this theory, cost, can be defined as how much a student has to sacrifice to engage in a task. However, EVT researchers appear to have forgotten the component of cost. Though cost has been theorized as an important component of EVT, empirical work has neglected to measure and study it (Wigfield & Cambria, 2010). As a result, cost and its relationship with student outcomes is largely unknown (Wigfield & Eccles, 2000). The focus of the current study is to address this shortcoming in the literature by reviewing what is currently known about cost and proposing a new scale to measure it. Scale development for cost was an iterative process, guided by Benson’s framework for construct validation (Benson, 1998). The first iteration adopted a top-down approach by conducting an in-depth analysis of the history of EVT and its measurement in educational psychology, as well as cost-related constructs in other literatures in psychology. I used theory and past literature to determine the initial theoretical structure of cost. In the second iteration of scale development, I adopted a bottom-up approach by evaluating data from an exploratory, qualitative study. In the final iteration, the content validity of the proposed scale was investigated using input from a panel of experts. The conclusion of this project offers 36 items to measure numerous components of cost. I offer suggestions for future research to determine the structural and external validity of the scale.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know