Art Criticism, Volume 2, Number 2
1986
- 5Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage5
- Abstract Views3
- Downloads2
Textual Work Description
v. : ill. ; 22 cm (original analog pub.),If Art Criticism meets some of its editors’ hopes for it, we shall be able to claim the appearance of some art criticism, with subjects arising from the writers’ or editors’ decisions, rather than the art market’s. Articles on individual critics and on current groups and tendencies will lead towards the adequate history of art criticism so badly needed in relation to art and in relation to the literature of other disciplines. (L.A., D.B.K., Spring 1979) :: Diamond, Josephine, “Baudelaire’s Exposure of the Photographic Image.” Glaser, David, “Spectacle in Recent Art.” Tuchman, Phyllis, “The Road Now Taken.” Werman, David S., “Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Art.” O’Connor, Francis V., “Depressive Elementalism and Modernism: A Postmodernist Meditation.” Boettger, Suzaan, “Regression in the Service of...” Platt, Susan Noyes, “Formalism and American Art Criticism in the 1920’s.” Kuspit, Donald B., “The Narcissistic Justification of Art Criticism.” Peglau, Michael, “Review: Rosalind Krauss, The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths.”
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know