Economic return to quality-enhancing research : the case of dark-cutting beef in Australia
Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research, Vol: 31, Issue: 1, Page: 63-69
1992
- 2Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
Article Description
An aggregated trading model is developed for assessing the size and distribution of benefits from research that reduces dark-cutting (DC) beef in Australia. The Australian beef industry has the potential to obtain gross research benefits in the range A$105-133 million per year from a 50% (or 4 percentage point) reduction in the incidence of beef with DC syndrome. The bulk of these benefits accrues to beef producers. The calculated level of benefits gives a guide to the maximum sum that could rationally be spent to obtain the requited reduction in DC.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know