The Advent of State and Local Lobby Regulations and the Legal and Ethical Considerations for Attorneys.
Vol: 3, Issue: 1, Page: 32-85
2013
- 177Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage177
- Downloads158
- Abstract Views19
Article Description
Advocacy is the primary goal and responsibility of two distinct and well-regulated professions: the lawyer and the lobbyist, each of whom is subject to his own set of rules and regulations. This Article is designed to analyze the intersection of the lawyer’s Disciplinary Code with developing, rules governing advocacy in the policy-making arenas throughout Texas. Increasingly, the line between legal and legislative advocacy has become blurred as more local Texas entities turn to state lobby regulations for inspiration. This Article will consider the state Lobby Law, including its history and structure, as a framework for subsequent efforts to regulate lobbying and will identify the common elements of lobby regulation systems, with a particular focus on their treatment of attorneys. It will also analyze how, at every level in Texas, the rules of engagement regarding communication and advocacy are being imposed with varying and significant consequences for attorneys, with a particular emphasis on how local governmental entities are literally rewriting those rules of engagement. Finally, this Article will analyze the potential consequences for all who advocate before governmental entities and attempt to influence public servants, including criminal and ethical issues, with a particular focus on attorneys engaged in lobbying. As local lobby regulations become more common, attorneys dealing with local governments will be forced to examine the fundamental aspects of the legal practice, including the structure of the representation, the nature of advocacy and communication, and the meaning of confidentiality.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know