The Texas Lawyer's Creed: Exploring Its Origin and Impact over the Last Quarter Century
Vol: 6, Issue: 1, Page: 120-155
2016
- 461Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage461
- Downloads399
- Abstract Views62
Article Description
This Comment examines different practical applications of the Creed and addresses the courts’ use of the Creed as a guide for desired ethical conduct. Additionally, this Comment includes an appendix of cases in which courts have cited the Creed and incorporates a survey of prominent individuals in the legal profession, including individuals who were instrumental in drafting or adopting the Creed.Part III provides a historical background, detailing the increased incivility within the legal profession and the need for the profession to confront internally the incivility. Understanding the environment that gave birth to the Creed and the profession’s drive to organize formal responses to curtail the unethical behavior of attorneys illuminates the Creed’s purpose. Part IV explores the promulgation of the Creed, what the drafters hoped to achieve, and briefly analyzes the Creed’s provisions. Part V discusses the Creed’s evolution, specifically focusing on how the Creed was initially received and the opposition it has encountered. Part VI summarizes the Creed’s integration by the judiciary and the legal profession. Part VII provides a current perspective of the Creed from prominent members of the legal community.This Comment concludes with the profession’s ability to uphold a high level of civility and professionalism and proposes recommendations for the Creed’s future use.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know