The completive and potential form of Chichicapan Zapotec verbs
Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session, Vol: 25, Issue: 1
1981
- 180Usage
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage180
- Downloads159
- Abstract Views21
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
From the introduction: "The phonological changes associated with the potential and completive aspects in Zapotecan languages have been traditionally analyzed suppletively (Butler 1980, Pickett 1960). In this paper I examine suppletive and nonsuppletive analyses of the potential and completive aspects of Chichicapan Zapotec, hereafter ChZ. I show that a nonsuppletive analysis of the facts of ChZ is more insightful than a suppletive one."
Bibliographic Details
https://commons.und.edu/sil-work-papers/vol25/iss1/2; https://commons.und.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1251&context=sil-work-papers&unstamped=1; http://dx.doi.org/10.31356/silwp.vol25.02; https://commons.und.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1251&context=sil-work-papers; https://dx.doi.org/10.31356/silwp.vol25.02; https://commons.und.edu/sil-work-papers/vol25/iss1/2/
University of North Dakota
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know