Advancements to direct object in Southeastern Tepehuan
Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session, Vol: 25, Issue: 1
1981
- 159Usage
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage159
- Downloads128
- Abstract Views31
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
From the introduction: "This paper seeks to justify a bistratal analysis for certain clauses in Southeastern Tepehuan (SET). In intransitive clauses (where the subject is the only nominal), or in transitive clauses where a direct object is also present, the account of subject and object agreement is straight forward. But in transitive clauses where a notional indirect object or benefactee is present as well, these are advanced to the status of direct object; they replace the initial direct object and determine object agreement on the verb. In section 1 I give the pertinent facts about term marking and show that verbs agree with their final direct objects. In section 2 I give evidence for the 3-2, benefactee-2, and comitative-2 advancements. Then in section 3 I argue that this analysis is preferable to either of two monostratal analyses that could be proposed to describe these facts."
Bibliographic Details
https://commons.und.edu/sil-work-papers/vol25/iss1/4; https://commons.und.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1253&context=sil-work-papers&unstamped=1; http://dx.doi.org/10.31356/silwp.vol25.04; https://commons.und.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1253&context=sil-work-papers; https://dx.doi.org/10.31356/silwp.vol25.04; https://commons.und.edu/sil-work-papers/vol25/iss1/4/
University of North Dakota
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know