Mass Chlamydia Screening vs. Opportunistic Screening in College Freshmen
2013
- 33Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage33
- Downloads19
- Abstract Views14
Artifact Description
Chlamydia trachomatis is the number one sexually transmitted disease in the United States and North Dakota. It has seen a steady rise in the past 10 years. Chlamydia is a preventable and treatable disease but the current lack of sufficient screening and identification of this disease often leads to many health consequences. Standard USPSTF screening guidelines are available for practitioners but despite the use of recommended opportunistic screening with patients, only about 3 8% of females ages 15-25 years are being screened appropriately and there is even less identification in males. There is growing literature on the efficacy of using mass chlamydia screening; especially in high school and college populations due to the high risk status found in these age groups. Mass chlamydia screenings are feasible, reproducible, acceptable among students and staff, and are cost-effective. Several studies have implemented mass screenings to determine effectiveness but further investigation into additional benefits and limitations of mass chlamydia screening needs to be explored. Researchers are also examining the impact of combining appropriate education with screening, and the use of patient self-selection, to yield increased screening rates without causing over-screening and to yield more cost-effective screening methods. College maybe an ideal avenue to mass screen a large number of young adults simultaneously and ultimately decrease the growing incidence of Chlamydia in our country
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know