An Analysis of Single-Family Housing and Certain Alternatives to Alleviate the Market Depression
1977
- 22Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage22
- Downloads20
- Abstract Views2
Artifact Description
This study is an attempt to identify and analyze some of the reasons why the single-family housing market is in decline and whether contractors can build homes that can be affordable and yet meet demandsThe findings of the study discloses why the market in 1973 was in depression by discussing both the situation of the contractors and buyers. Reasons for contractors consist of inflation in building costs, archaic building codes, and high land prices. Reasons for the buyers consist of high mortgage interest rates and high cost of ownership in relation to income. Alternatives are disclosed that some contractors are now applying and others are offered that can further alleviate the problem. The findings also disclose that industrialized or modular homes significantly aid contractors to control costs and make housing affordable yet still desirable to potential buyersThe author concludes that the single-family house does have a future if there is a universal change in building construction instead of localized innovations by a few contractors. Additionally, the author suggests that modular housing offers the real opportunity for expansion in the housing market by offering the double-wide modular home as a substitute for conventional housing
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know