Use of chlorine dioxide to remove fish pathogens from garrison diversion water
1993
- 7Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage7
- Downloads7
Artifact Description
This report considers the use of chlorine dioxide as an alternate disinfectant for the removal of biota from Garrison Diversion water. Laboratory testing has shown that chlorine may not be an acceptable disinfectant because it can produce carcinogens from side reactions with constituents found in natural surface waters.This study used Lake Sakakawea water collected at the Snake Creek Pumping Station located on the eastern shore. Water samples were of direct filtration effluent from a laboratory scale filter column. samples were gathered at several different turbidity levels. The "DPD" method, as published in "Standard Methods for the Analysis of Water and Wastewater," was used to measure the residuals of chlorine dioxide after dosing the samples and allowing a contact time of 10 minutes.The data was graphed using a spreadsheet and tables were used to determine dosages required for the various turbidity levels treated. Aliquots of samples were plated and incubated to determine effects of disinfection. All procedures were followed as out-lined in "Standard Methods for the Analysis of Waters and Wastewaters."Chlorine dioxide will produce a residual concentration of chlorine species in the dosed sample. This residual usually consists for the most part of unreacted chlorine dioxide, which is called a free residual. The results of this study indicate that chlorine dioxide is an effective means of removing pathogenic bacteria and viruses from Garrison Diversion water when disinfection is carried out under the standard conditions used in the laboratory and with a 10 minute contact time.The cost of the treatment has been estimated using conventional municipal drinking water process trains. Cost of treatment varies indirectly with treatment plant capacity. A treatment plant for domestic water supply is a good example of return to scale, to use a term from economics.The cost of using chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant is on parity with other chemicals such as chlorine, chloramine and other chlorine-based dosing additives when used in a large treatment system such as Garrison Diversion would require.More research is needed to determine the medical effects of such disinfectant byproducts as chlorite and chlorate. These byproducts are invariably present when dosing water with chlorine dioxide, though not always detectable.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know