Convergence in Topological Spaces
1967
- 84Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage84
- Abstract Views57
- Downloads27
Thesis / Dissertation Description
In this thesis the writer has considered types of convergence in an arbitrary topological space. Three types of convergence are considered, convergence of sequences in the real numbers with the usual topology, convergence of Moore-Smith sequences in an arbitrary topological space, and convergence of filters in an arbitrary topological space.In Chapter II, we show that sequences are inadequate to describe limit points of sets and hence the topology in an arbitrary topological space. The idea of a sequence is generalized in this chapter to Moore-Smith sequences and in Chapter III to filters.In Chapter II we prove that convergence of Moore-Smith sequences is sufficient to describe limit points, closed sets, the closure of a set, open sets, and in fact the topology of an arbitrary space. Although the convergence of filters and Moore-Smith sequences differ greatly, we prove these same results using filters. However, in Chapter II we also prove an iterated limit theorem using generalized Cauchy sequences in a complete metric space.Chapter IV is in many respects the most important, although containing the fewest results. For in Chapter IV we are able to relate convergence of filters to convergence of Moore-Smith sequences. In fact we prove that filters and Moore-Smith sequences are equivalent convergence theories.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know