ELP: Tractable rules for OWL 2
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 5318 LNCS, Page: 649-664
2008
- 80Citations
- 4Usage
- 44Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations80
- Citation Indexes80
- 80
- CrossRef30
- Usage4
- Abstract Views4
- Captures44
- Readers44
- 44
Conference Paper Description
We introduce as a decidable fragment of the Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) that admits reasoning in polynomial time. is based on the tractable description logic , and encompasses an extended notion of the recently proposed DL rules for that logic. Thus extends with a number of features introduced by the forthcoming OWL 2, such as disjoint roles, local reflexivity, certain range restrictions, and the universal role. We present a reasoning algorithm based on a translation of to Datalog, and this translation also enables the seamless integration of DL-safe rules into . While reasoning with DL-safe rules as such is already highly intractable, we show that DL-safe rules based on the Description Logic Programming (DLP) fragment of OWL 2 can be admitted in without losing tractability. © 2008 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=57549115795&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_41; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_41; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_41; https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/cse/121; https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1120&context=cse; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_41; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_41; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_41; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_41
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know