The Impact of Non-Reading Language Performance on the Estimation of Premorbid IQ among Normal Elderly Individuals
2011
- 118Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage118
- Downloads101
- Abstract Views17
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The influence of non-reading language ability was studied in the context of estimating premorbid IQ among normal elderly individuals. Non-reading language performance was measured by the Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) Test and the Animal Naming (AN) Test. Non-reading language disturbances were divided into three levels (i.e., no disturbance on COWA and AN, either COWA or AN disturbance, and both COWA and AN disturbances). Intellectual ability was primarily measured by the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). Additionally, reading measures such as the New Adult Reading Test- Revised (NART-R) and the Wide Range Achievement Test- Fourth Edition (WRAT-4) Word Reading subtest were used to predict premorbid intellectual ability. Results indicated that the scores on the WASI Full Scale IQ (FSIQ), NART-R estimated FSIQ, and WRAT-4 Word Reading subtest decreased when the severity of the non-reading language disturbances increased. Results also suggested that non-reading language performance did not predict intellectual ability across the three levels of disturbances. Instead, the NART-R was found to account for more variance in WASI FSIQ scores when there were no non-reading language disturbances (83.4%) and COWA or AN disturbance (52.4%). The WRAT-4 Word Reading subtest was found to account for more variance (84.1%) in WASI FSIQ scores when there were disturbances on both COWA and AN. Limitations of the study, directions for future research, and diversity issues were also addressed.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know