Global Joint Registry: Analysis of Revision Hip Arthroplasty Data
2020
- 741Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage741
- Downloads656
- Abstract Views85
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become well-known as being one of the most successful procedures with much long-term positive clinical results. However, revision surgeries are still required. The four most common failure modes for THAs, “reasons for revision”, are loosening, dislocation or instability, fracture, and infection. The goal of a hip arthroplasty register is to gather information on patients that undergo a total hip arthroplasty and factors pertaining to their surgery which may affect their outcome for future years such as the reason for revision. Analysis of this data can help with the allocation of healthcare funds and the efficacy of on both the clinical and device side. The objective of this research was to compile the national registries for hip replacements into a global registry, comparing the data from different countries and statistically analyzing the reasons for revision. Global trends of revision surgeries were identified and projected. A total of 37 national joint registries were identified, of which 15 contained data on the failure modes. The results showed that the reason for revision had a significant effect on the percentage of revisions with loosening leading to a significantly greater percentage of revisions than any other reason. For the countries with the most complete data, it was found that the country did not have any significant effect on the percentage of revision. Additionally, when analyzing various countries over a 5-6-year period, it was found that the year did not significantly affect the percentage of revisions.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know