User Interface Design for Supervisory Control of Multiple Manned and Unmanned Air Vehicles
2022
- 275Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage275
- Downloads214
- Abstract Views61
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This dissertation research will cover lessons learned from the three-year, iterative design and evaluation of TECUMSA (Tasking and Execution of Collaborative Unmanned and Manned Systems with Autonomy). TECUMSA is a graphical user interface and autonomous tool suite that enables a single operator (e.g., an Air Mission Commander) to team with autonomous capabilities (e.g., route planning, aircraft task allocation) to effectively command and control multiple manned and unmanned aircraft in a contested battlespace. The user/AMC was responsible for accomplishing a series of reconnaissance, surveillance, and threat neutralization tasks in a hostile and dynamic simulated battlespace. The main challenges in this problem space are cognitive bandwidth of operators (e.g., maintaining situation awareness, allocating attention flexibly across multiple aircraft), and their ability to coordinate and collaborate with subordinate autonomous agents. The main objective of this research was therefore determining what control mechanisms offered the TECUMSA operator stability and reliability of control. Two formal system evaluations will be discussed, where a total of 15 Army aviators used TECUMSA to complete multiple hours of simulated air assault operations in a synthetic task environment. This research explored distributed supervisory control, where the operator distributed authority to automation for continuous manual control tasks using Play Calling (i.e., directability). The following research will also cover observations from the system evaluations highlighting interface features that afforded the user the ability to observe, perceive, and understand the state of the world relative to their goals and intentions (i.e., observability). One of the major themes in this dissertation is the importance of observability and directability as design principles, and the implications they have for both user interface design and human-autonomy teaming.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know