Trends in Contraceptive Use, Type, and Distribution Following Implementation of the Affordable Care Act
2016
- 263Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage263
- Downloads191
- Abstract Views72
Artifact Description
Background: Over half of all births in the United States are the result of unintended pregnancies. Nearly one half of those women are using contraception incorrectly, and the rest are not using it at all. A major barrier to the use of highly effective methods of contraception is cost. One of the major goals of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was to make highly effective contraceptives available to all women at no cost.Objective: To examine the changes in utilization and methods of contraception since the ACA was effected in 2012.Methods: Comparisons were made on summary data of contraception use from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Three time period (2002, 2006-2010, 2011-2013) were compared for changes in utilization and methods chosen. Data were analyzed by age, race, and education as detailed in the NSFG.Results: Overall utilization of contraceptives remained unchanged at 62% of reproductive aged women (15-44 years) and across the age, race and educational attainment. Contraceptive method of choice has changed, favoring long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods: IUD use increased from 2% to 10.3% overall and was the only method to increase across all variables. Conclusions: These early data show the ACA has had a small impact on contraceptive choice, yet the trend is in a positive direction toward the most effective methods. Unfortunately, Black women, who have the highest rate of unintended pregnancy, are still being left behind in utilization of contraception.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know