A System for Labeling and Predicting Group Interaction in Meetings
2005
- 3Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage3
- Abstract Views3
Artifact Description
Automatic processing of human meetings requires high-level information about group interaction as well as accurate speech recognition (speech-to-text). The goal of this project was to develop a system for labeling meeting styles and use these labels to evaluate automatic prediction. Meeting Acts (MAs) are descriptors for group interaction that specify the high-level function taking place in a meeting. Dialog Acts (DAs) are labels that describe the function of individual utterances. Using the Meeting Corpus, a collection of transcribed meetings and their accompanying DA labels, we have developed a system of MA labels that include Reporting, Negotiation, Planning, and Brainstorming. Several researchers have applied this labeling system to selected meetings in the corpus. When labels were applied to the same meeting by different labelers, significant agreement was found. Prediction results showing the relationship between high-level information (MAs) and given sentence-level information (DAs) will be presented.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know