Laboratory Exercise Demonstrating Systematic Error in Instrumental Analyses: Aberrant Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy of Cadmium
2011
- 6Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage6
- Abstract Views6
Artifact Description
Commercial stock solutions are routinely used to prepare calibration standards for atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). Unfortunately, these solutions contain high concentrations of acid (e.g., 2-6 % HNO3) which may cause interferences in the AAS signal. Using calibration standards prepared from commercial stock solutions, 200 µM Cd (as Cd(NO3)2·4H20) test solutions were consistently quantified by air-acetylene flame AAS to contain ~135 µM Cd. Three sets of calibration standards, ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 ppm Cd, were prepared from two commercial 1000 ppm Cd solutions and a 1000 ppm Cd solution made from 3CdSO4·8H20. The 3CdSO4·8H20 standards produced a calibration curve with linear slope ~33% lower than the slopes of both sets of commercial standards. Using these results as a framework, a laboratory exercise appropriate for an Instrumental Analysis course is prepared. Students will design and perform experiments to identify and eliminate the systematic error in Cd AAS analyses.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know