3D Streamline visualization Method Based on Clustering Fusion
Xitong Fangzhen Xuebao / Journal of System Simulation, ISSN: 1004-731X, Vol: 36, Issue: 3, Page: 625-635
2024
- 37Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage37
- Downloads24
- Abstract Views13
Article Description
In order to solve the problems of incomplete feature extraction, continuity destruction of flow field by visual results, and poor representation of streamline caused by unstable clustering division when the clustering method is used to realize 3D streamline visualization. A 3D streamline visualization method based on clustering fusion is proposed. It consists of a distance measurement method between features and a clustering fusion method, which takes the inter-feature distance and spatial distance as the similarity between streamlines for clustering and then performs weighted merging and subdivision of the obtained clustering result. The method has been tested on data sets with different features and compared qualitatively and quantitatively with the existing methods. The results show that compared with the existing methods, the proposed method can better balance the relationship between feature extraction and streamline distribution, and the stability of clustering division is improved by 2%~5%. The accuracy of vector filed reconstruction is improved by 3%~5%.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85187996048&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.22-1257; https://dc-china-simulation.researchcommons.org/journal/vol36/iss3/8; https://dc-china-simulation.researchcommons.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4271&context=journal; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=7669287&internal_id=7669287&from=elsevier; https://dx.doi.org/10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.22-1257; https://www.chndoi.org/Resolution/Handler?doi=10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.22-1257
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know