Managing and Mitigating Risk in Biologics Process Transfer
2017
- 36Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage36
- Abstract Views36
Abstract Description
processes into clinical and commercial production facilities. However, the application of the full set of tactics for every process transfer is often not warranted. Product quality and process performance must fulfil expectations in every process transfer, but the tactics to achieve these goals are typically product/project-dependent.Two important factors to consider when allocating tactics (and the associated resources) to a particular process transfer are the probability of an initial process transfer delay, and the impact to patients and the company of such a delay. The probability of an initial process implementation problem is heighted under a number of circumstances: for example, when the transfer is to an unfamiliar plant, when the process is non-platformed in some aspect, or when there has been a change of equipment or automation software in the plant. The impact to patients and financial impact to the company of a process start-up delay is also project specific.Janssen Pharmaceuticals transfers bulk biologics processes to a variety of internal and external, clinical and commercial production facilities around the world. In this presentation, we will discuss our menu of process transfer tactics, and our business process for allocating tactics and resources to each process transfer. The presentation will be illustrated by examples from recent clinical and commercial process transfers.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know