Case Study: Subjecting A well-characterized biocontainer film to the standardized bpog extractables protocol
2017
- 48Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage48
- Abstract Views48
Abstract Description
Both the supplier and end-user communities require access to extractables data that is technically adequate for initial assessment of risk during material selection, component assessment and qualification, and subsequent process evaluation of single-use assemblies. Standardized extractables data for single-use components promises efficiencies in the adoption and application of single-use technologies, as well as functional equivalency substitutions. This is especially valid when combined with the concept of well-characterized materials that has taken centerstage in recent USP publications. The opportunity to achieve a comprehensive extractables data set reminiscent of a polymeric material’s processing signature augmented with forensic analysis and toxicology evaluation can expand our knowledge of polymeric materials and form factors that are suitable for bioprocessing. SME’s in materials science tasked with enhancing the understanding of the materials of construction go beyond the basic resin formulations to include discerning the impact of a material’s processing signature on standardized extractables profiles, and ultimately to understanding associated process variability and/or potential impacts to patient safety. This presentation will provide a comprehensive case study of the standardized BPOG extractables protocol applied to a well characterized biocontainer film, forensic analysis of radiolytic degradation chemical compounds, and lessons learned.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know