The validity and reliability of the Proactive Coping Inventory (PCI): Thai version
Chulalongkorn Medical Journal, ISSN: 2651-2343, Vol: 57, Issue: 6, Page: 765-778
2013
- 599Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage599
- Downloads513
- Abstract Views86
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Background : The Proactive Coping Inventory (PCI), a research instrument, which takes a multidimensional approach to and positive facet of coping that aims for self-regulatory goal attainment and personal growth rather than focuses on self-regulatory threat appraisal. At the moment, PCI has not been officially developed into Thai version. Objective : To develop and test the validity and reliability of The Proactive Coping Inventory: Thai Version for use as a multidimensional research instrument in Thai society. Design : The translation of psychometric instrument with validity and reliability assessment. Setting : Chulalongkorn University Materials and Methods : Subjects were 308 Chulalongkorn University undergraduate students aged ≥ 18 years, in 1st semester, academic year 2012, recruited purposively to answer 1) personal information questionnaire, and 2) the Proactive Coping Inventory (Greenglass, Schwarzer, and Taubert (1999): Thai Version, translated from original English version, where Content Validity Index calculated after 5 experts reviewed. Reliability tested data collected of Internal Consistency - Cronbach’s Alpha method. Conclusion : The Proactive Coping Inventory: Thai Version with 7 dimensions (55 items), has strong reliability and validity, suitable for use as multidimensional research instrument in Thai society.
Bibliographic Details
Office of Academic Resources, Chulalongkorn University
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know