Affiliation During a Pandemic: How Gender, Gender Role Adherence, and Social Support Affect Adjustment
2021
- 97Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage97
- Abstract Views84
- Downloads13
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The current COVID-19 pandemic provided an excellent opportunity to explore gender differences in response to stress. In my study, I investigated how gender and adherence to the feminine gender role affected the extent to which people provided social support to others and how the provision of social support then affected fear of COVID-19 and well-being. In accordance with tend-and-befriend theory and social role theory, I expected to find main effects for gender and adherence to the feminine gender role in a sample of MTurk workers. I also predicted that providing a greater extent of social support to others would predict decreased fear of COVID-19 and increased well-being. Finally, I hypothesized that fear of COVID-19 and well-being would be inversely correlated. However, I found that it may be men with high adherence to the feminine gender role who provide the greatest extent of social support to others and that there may be an interaction between gender and adherence to the feminine gender role. Additionally, the provision of social support predicted both well-being and fear of COVID-19, which were inversely correlated. These findings suggest that gender is an incomplete explanatory variable in understanding why people affiliate in response to stress.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know