Working with the Enemy: When Members of a Staff Were Once on Opposite Sides of a War, what Tools can the Manager Employ to Diminish Animosity and Create an Effective Work Environment?
2002
- 12Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage12
- Abstract Views12
Thesis / Dissertation Description
In an atmosphere of shifting demographics the United States is facing many changes. These changes are reflected in the make-up of office personnel and are gradually creating a new set of issues for managers to deal with. Immigrants from war-torn countries are increasingly found in the American workforce and now the likelihood that members of a staff may have at one time been on opposite sides of a war is a real consideration. In this paper I explore the implications of a situation which finds ex-enemies working in the same office.X International school in Washington DC was the site of my investigation. I employed three basic methods of research: qualitative interviews, document review and participant observation. The interviews were completed by manager-level staff members. The managers were asked to comment about their first-hand experience dealing with former enemies in an office. The main question posed in this paper was: When members of a staff were once on opposite sides of a war, what tools can the manager employ to diminish animosity and create an effective work environment?”The goal of this paper is to highlight behaviors that a manager of ex-enemies may encounter and then offer a tool box of strategies that were successfully employed at X International. At this time relatively little information can be found on this specific topic. Hopefully these tools will offer some assistance and will be expanded upon as research on this particular area of diversity and conflict transformation continues.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know