A Case Study of Organizational Communication in a Multicultural US Corporation and Its Effect on the Bottom Line
2002
- 114Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage114
- Abstract Views114
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Organizational communication is an evolving field that includes communication theory, intercultural communication principles, and organizational behavior. Relatively little information exists linking organizational communication to organizational success. In this paper, I attempt to highlight how one company’s organizational communication function contributed to the company’s financial failure.Telco, a fictitious name of a telecommunications company based in the US with offices in ten US cities, was the site for my research. Telco is a multicultural company that employed up to 550 people and had $450 million in investment. In July and October of 2001, the company conducted massive layoffs and as of January 2002, only 20 employees remained.The main question I asked in my research was: How did the organizational communication process play a role in the demise of a US multicultural corporation? As a point of clarification, this paper does not assume organizational communication was the reason the company failed. It examines the company from a communication perspective to ascertain the contributory factors of the organizational communication function.To answer the question, several research techniques were utilized. First, to identify the communication needs of the company, I conducted a survey. To help identify how communication problems were impacting work performance, qualitative interviews with personnel were conducted. The process of document review using the Executive Management’s meetings was applied to assess why communication problems were occurring and what inhibited their resolution. Conversations with personnel, observations of behavior witnessed and field sites conducted to office locations were documented to also help with this analysis.In the discussion section of the paper, I talk about how the role of power and a lack of understanding intercultural communication principles contributed to the failure of a company to reach its revenue targets. It is the hope of this study to add to the minimal data that exists in supplying hard evidence that communication does have an effect on the bottom-line.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know