How can a long-term residential treatment program for emotionally disturbed children in a mostly white community better serve its Hispanic clients and their families? : a preliminary inquiry at one small residence in Western Massachusetts
2004
- 15Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage15
- Abstract Views15
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This paper is intended as a preliminary inquiry into the stated topic. The author conducted semi-structured interviews with all twelve employees of one residential unit, serving six emotionally disturbed boys ages ten to thirteen, within a larger program, located in a mostly white western Massachusetts college town. The interviewees' observations are examined within the context of the mainstream residential treatment literature, as well as the "tolerating versus valuing" diversity model of Tyler Cox. The researcher, who is a long-time employee of the residential program, initiated the project in response to a meeting held by the program’s managers after two recent placements of Hispanic clients had failed to end in graduation. The findings in this paper were later shared with the interviewees at a staff meeting convened on the subject. It was hoped that this paper and initial meeting would serve as first step toward addressing and planning a course of action on the topic of providing more effective service to Hispanic clients and families in the program.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know