Humor in the workplace
2001
- 740Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage740
- Abstract Views740
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This Capstone paper was a study of humor in the workplace at the School for International Training in Brattleboro, Vermont. The main research question for the paper was "How do four SIT student-centered departments create and use humor?" This paper also considers three sub-questions. 1). What factors influenced an individuals' sense of humor in relation to departmental creation and use of humor? 2). What factors influenced gender-based creation and appreciation of humor in each of the four student-centered departments? 3). What factors influenced how each of the four student-centered departments created and used their distinctive style of humor? The methods used was a self-created seven question humor questionnaire that briefly introduce the topic to 18 participants who were permanent employees and who worked in various positions in four student-centered departments at the SIT. In addition, the questionnaire prepared participants for a one-hour focus group discussion. Of the eighteen, four participants, two men and two women participated in the focus group and shared their views on the topic of how gender influences the creation and appreciation of humor in their department. This paper concludes with four salient points on how the four student-centered departments created and used humor in their workplace, which are personal background influences such as family, each department employed a feminine style of humor, and each department used humor as a intercultural tool to create a distinctive style of humor.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know