Participatory action research and evaluation: creating change on the Yukon flats
2000
- 18Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage18
- Abstract Views18
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This inquiry addresses the applicability of the Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach in executing Tribal, village-based evaluations of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (US EPA)Indian General Assistance Program (IGAP). The research question follows: can the PAR approach serve as an effective method for performing Tribal evaluations of federal programs in Native America, particularly the EPA IGAP? The sub-questions go further to address the specific areas in which the PAR approach's effectiveness is being examined: 1. building local administrative capacity in project management, specifically the evaluation process. 2. raising critical consciousness at the local level concerning the programmatic life cycle. 3. empowering the local community through the participatory process. and 4. communicating Tribal perspectives to federal agencies on their programs. The research environment consisted of primarily two native Athabascan villages in the rural, northern interior of Alaska. The methodology employed included: village-based community meeting evaluation workshops similar to semi-structured focus groups, one-to-one capacity-building in project evaluation, informal conversations, and one-to-one semi-structured interviewing. The PAR approach serves as the basis for my research methodology. This approach addresses the integrative nature of the inquiry, as it examines the process and its outlining effects on the local participants while also creating a data set on the Tribal perspective of EPA IGAP. The intended outcome of the project is to have examined a process which can provide results on a variety of levels, to have created a place for learning for myself, for local participants, and for federal agency staff.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know