The consortium model in study abroad : an evolutionary perspective
2000
- 25Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage25
- Abstract Views25
Thesis / Dissertation Description
My research question seeks to find out what strategies study abroad consortia administrators have employed in order to remain viable entities and to continue to serve their members as expectations evolve. Using personal interviews and questionnaires addressed to consortia administrators and members, I provide evaluations of the Northwest Council on Study Abroad, the Great Lakes Colleges Association, the Associated Colleges of the Midwest, the Brethren Colleges Abroad, and the Institute for the International Education of Students. I include a comparison of how these consortia have evolved, an overview of trends I have observed during my research, and provide projections on trends for the future of study abroad consortia. I conclude that creative entrepreneurship is the basis of all five consortia's longevity. The ability to reinvent themselves in response to current trends has proven vital. For each of them, their original conceptualization has informed the way in which they have evolved, and success has been defined by how well they are able to serve their members. My research could prove useful for existing study abroad consortia agents and administrators, those considering forming a consortium, or existing consortium members.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know