The small training department : how is an employee-driven department formed in a time of urgent need?
2001
- 11Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage11
- Abstract Views11
Thesis / Dissertation Description
When answering the question, "How is an employee-driven training department formed in a time of urgent need?" an examination of all of the collected data creates a complex, dynamic case study of C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. C&S is the third largest grocery wholesaler in the USA, and is headquartered in Brattleboro, Vermont. Through the case study, C&S's organizational uniqueness is highlighted and so is the universality of the challenges it faces as it struggles to define training's role in times of urgent need. Today's era of acquisitions, right-sizing, and cost consciousness, has forced organizations and employees to do more with less. To help people develop the tools they need to do so, many organizations like C&S, are opting to develop their own training departments. These departments are much less costly than using an outside training source, produce materials tailored specifically to the organization's needs, and can be flexible to change. This case study strives to take the ambiguity out of training and show how human development and job performance are intricately linked to organizational objectives. The case study also demonstrates the time and cost benefits of having employees directly involved in their own development and growth. Finally the case study is an important lesson in the responsibilities and pitfalls that are present in the development of any new training department.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know