The Effectiveness And Development Sustainability Of NGOs’ Approach To Modernizing Ecological Issues: A Case Study Of The Sustainable Colorado Water Caucus’ Initiatives
2008
- 35Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage35
- Abstract Views35
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This study aims to answer a research question with regard to the extent that the water conservation programs of the Sustainable Colorado Water Caucus either promote or hinder sustainable development in the communities it serves. There are several relevant themes in the development discourse that are reviewed. They are community representation, modernization, sociological development, participation, empowerment, and an alternative approach. Data collection methods include participant observation, a review of official documents, and interviews of the members of the Water Caucus.The over-appropriated water for beneficial use and the growing need for water in Colorado threaten the sustainability of water availability and threaten the functions of water for river ecosystems. The Sustainable Colorado Water Caucus is a coalition of fifteen NGOs, which conduct several initiatives, to work on these issues. My research findings show that the water development initiatives by the Colorado Water Caucus are in the frame of structural functionalism and modernization. Society has to modernize itself, in overcoming a water crisis, by improving its water law management system, and rational social behavior, as well as the application of water efficient technology. The Caucus doesn’t ignore the economic growth approach. It supports economic growth that enhances the quality of life of in the community. This paper also criticizes the approach of ecological modernization, which doesn’t necessarily solve environmental issues and provide community empowerment. The description and conclusions should be of use to those professionals interested in water development issues and ecology.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know